GOLIATH PATENT CASES : A SEARCH FOR THE MOST PRACTICAL MECHANISM OF THIRD PARTY LITIGATION FINANCING FOR SMALL PLAINTIFFS Bruce
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Third-Party Actions: A Plaintiff 's Perspective
INTRODUCTION Paragraph 2-406 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure permits a defendant to join a third party who may be liable to him for all or part of the plaintiffs claim against him. , Although paragraph 2-406 pertains directly to actions that may be initiated by defendants, third-party practice poses significant ramifications for the plaintiff in terms of trial strategy and negotiation, ...
متن کاملThe Patent Litigation Explosion
This paper provides the first look at patent litigation hazards for public firms during the 80s and 90s. Consistent with our model, litigation is more likely when prospective defendants spend more on R&D, when prospective plaintiffs acquire more patents and when firms are larger and technologically close. Public firms face dramatically increased hazards of litigation as plaintiffs and even more...
متن کاملThe Rise of Contingent Fee Representation in Patent Litigation
It is well known that plaintiff-side contingent representation is on the rise in patent litigation. But why? And what are the lawyers in the field like? Although scholars have studied contingent litigation in other contexts — such as medical malpractice, personal injury, and products liability litigation — patent litigation has received almost no attention. This gap in the literature is unsettl...
متن کاملOf Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-tech Patents
While each patent dispute is unique, most fit the profile of one of a limited number of patent litigation stories. A dispute between an independent inventor and a large company, for instance, is often cast in " David v. Goliath " terms. When two large companies fight over patents, in contrast, they are said to be playing the " sport of kings. " Some corporations engage in " defensive patenting ...
متن کاملModeling the Likely Effects of Litigation Financing
The arguments for and against third-party litigation financing are based on incorrect assumptions regarding the impacts on total litigation. A formal model incorporating the choices of the plaintiff, the lawyer, and the financier shows only minimal impact on total litigation, largely positive. Yet, after addressing the potential for long-term, strategic behavior by financiers, it is obvious tha...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014